http://www.kriesi.at/support/topic/coherence-and-wpml-performancs-problem Support Forum - Topic: Coherence and WPML performancs problem en-US Mon, 20 May 2013 16:33:10 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://www.kriesi.at/support/search.php http://www.kriesi.at/support/topic/coherence-and-wpml-performancs-problem#post-102255 Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:54:13 +0000 Nick 102255@http://www.kriesi.at/support/ <p>Hi,</p> <p>Right now you got 3 issues you have to deal with to go to the next level of speed, even though you did a fine job of taking out 10 full seconds. </p> <p>I think the greyscales can be sped up. You are displaying the same color thumbnails and greyscale thumbnails but from two different urls. This causes each to load twice , but if you were using the same images that wouldn't be happening. </p> <pre><code><a href="http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/app1_061-448x330.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/app1_061-448x330.jpg</a> and <a href="http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/app1_06-448x330.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/app1_06-448x330.jpg</a> ----------- <a href="http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/zimmer21-448x330.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/zimmer21-448x330.jpg</a> and <a href="http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/zimmer2-448x330.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/zimmer2-448x330.jpg</a> ----------- <a href="http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/zimmer21-448x330-greyscale.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/zimmer21-448x330-greyscale.jpg</a> and <a href="http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/zimmer2-448x330-greyscale.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/zimmer2-448x330-greyscale.jpg</a> --------- <a href="http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/app1_061-448x330-greyscale.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/app1_061-448x330-greyscale.jpg</a> and <a href="http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/app1_06-448x330-greyscale.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/app1_06-448x330-greyscale.jpg</a></code></pre> <p>*) Time to first byte is waaayyy too long and shows an improperly configured Apache. It should be around a quarter of a second maximum, and not over 1 second. (This will be tough and perhaps should be left for last).</p> <p>*) None of your images have an expiration. We can fix that right up with htaccess</p> <p>Open up your .htaccess file (make sure you have ftp access to the website first in case a mistake is made). I am not sure what is inside your .htaccess file , but you will need to add all of this: <a href="https://github.com/h5bp/html5-boilerplate/blob/master/.htaccess" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/h5bp/html5-boilerplate/blob/master/.htaccess</a></p> <p>The real part of that file you need are lines 1 - 280 ; . Just make sure they come before the normal 8-12 lines that Wordpress adds to the htaccess.</p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>Nick </p> http://www.kriesi.at/support/topic/coherence-and-wpml-performancs-problem#post-102075 Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:09:58 +0000 xxtita 102075@http://www.kriesi.at/support/ <p>Hi Nick,<br /> A lot of pics are now optimized. The portfolio-site still opens after click on the grayscale to slow.<br /> Here is the result of the webpagetest <a href="http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130319_WB_TJ7/" rel="nofollow">http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130319_WB_TJ7/</a><br /> Maybe it would get faster, if i can force the cache options for the provided images? could this be an idea? if yes, do you know how?<br /> thanks,<br /> tita </p> http://www.kriesi.at/support/topic/coherence-and-wpml-performancs-problem#post-101029 Wed, 13 Mar 2013 06:35:14 +0000 Nick 101029@http://www.kriesi.at/support/ <p>Hi,</p> <p>You are also loading a 1.5meg sized image on the page, which is your #1 problem, and takes 90% of the load time ( <a href="http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/oBERTAUERN-2009-rAFFALT_138.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://montanara-ramsau.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/oBERTAUERN-2009-rAFFALT_138.jpg</a> ) .. Please optimize this image </p> <p><a href="http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130313_HB_0d2172c87e07df19d6d87c458d53eaaa/1/details/" rel="nofollow">http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130313_HB_0d2172c87e07df19d6d87c458d53eaaa/1/details/</a></p> <p>Also if you notice there are those 4-5 images for the main slider that look like can also use a bit of optimization. Try using this without resizer <a href="http://jpeg-optimizer.com/" rel="nofollow">http://jpeg-optimizer.com/</a></p> <p>Everything else as you can see by the link looks very tight, fast loading.</p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>Nick </p> http://www.kriesi.at/support/topic/coherence-and-wpml-performancs-problem#post-100641 Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:15:28 +0000 Devin 100641@http://www.kriesi.at/support/ <p>I'm getting a huge delay as well when trying to pull up an ajax portfolio item on the homepage. I'm not sure what the cause is here though but you could try creating a very basic portfolio item with just a single small image in it to get a comparison and see if it could be because of the size of the images in that portfolio item or if its something else.</p> <p>Regards,</p> <p>Devin </p> http://www.kriesi.at/support/topic/coherence-and-wpml-performancs-problem#post-100530 Mon, 11 Mar 2013 07:48:40 +0000 xxtita 100530@http://www.kriesi.at/support/ <p>Hi Nick,<br /> as i told, now with <a href="http://inoplugs.com/wpml">WPML</a> 2.7.1 the backend in much faster than it was. Still slow, but ok. What i worry most about is the portfolio site. <a href="http://montanara-ramsau.at/ferienwohnung/" rel="nofollow">http://montanara-ramsau.at/ferienwohnung/</a><br /> When you click on the grayscale pics, it lasts 8000ms to open the portfolio. Other sites without <a href="http://inoplugs.com/wpml">WPML</a> open the portfolio in 2000ms. Please click on the above mentioned portfolio to see what i mean. thanks. </p> http://www.kriesi.at/support/topic/coherence-and-wpml-performancs-problem#post-100459 Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:06:09 +0000 Nick 100459@http://www.kriesi.at/support/ <p>Hi,</p> <p>Hate to use a cliche but if you start fresh you will notice it will be a lot faster. I tested Coherence and <a href="http://inoplugs.com/wpml">WPML</a> a week ago and it performed well. Did you notice at what point things began slowing down? </p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>NIck </p> http://www.kriesi.at/support/topic/coherence-and-wpml-performancs-problem#post-100330 Sat, 09 Mar 2013 12:36:30 +0000 xxtita 100330@http://www.kriesi.at/support/ <p>WP 3.4.2, plugins now only <a href="http://inoplugs.com/wpml">WPML</a> and WP-Optimize, mem-limit pushed up to 128MB,<br /> backend ist now way better, still slow.<br /> frontend, portfolio site comes up fast, but when you click on a greyscale it lasts too long to open.<br /> I could live with it, but i want to make some other websites also with coherence and <a href="http://inoplugs.com/wpml">WPML</a>, and i cant do that, if its not getting better, or faster.<br /> any ideas left?<br /> thanks in advance. </p> http://www.kriesi.at/support/topic/coherence-and-wpml-performancs-problem#post-100296 Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:25:02 +0000 Devin 100296@http://www.kriesi.at/support/ <p>I've actually been hearing from a lot of people about somewhat slower backends with wordpress since 3.5.1. It could be a coincidence but it has been something I've now heard from sources outside of here as well.</p> <p>Typically, backend slowness is because of low memory availability. Here is a good guide on increase the memory available for wordpress to use: <a href="http://www.dailyblogging.org/wordpress/increase-wordpress-memory-limit/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailyblogging.org/wordpress/increase-wordpress-memory-limit/</a></p> <p>Regards,</p> <p>Devin </p> http://www.kriesi.at/support/topic/coherence-and-wpml-performancs-problem#post-100180 Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:07:50 +0000 xxtita 100180@http://www.kriesi.at/support/ <p>hi Devin,<br /> Frontend is ok, ecxept the portfolio, which is very slow to e.g. other sites with coherence and without <a href="http://inoplugs.com/wpml">WPML</a> <a href="http://montanara-ramsau.at/ferienwohnung/" rel="nofollow">http://montanara-ramsau.at/ferienwohnung/</a><br /> But really slow is the backend. Can i send you PM with access to the site? </p> http://www.kriesi.at/support/topic/coherence-and-wpml-performancs-problem#post-100115 Thu, 07 Mar 2013 20:38:59 +0000 Devin 100115@http://www.kriesi.at/support/ <p>Hi xxtita,</p> <p>Can you point out some specific examples of items working incorrectly or not slow. I'm not getting any visual errors when I view the site and it seems to be fairly responsive to page navigation and loading content (nothing I would call slow).</p> <p>Regards,</p> <p>Devin </p> http://www.kriesi.at/support/topic/coherence-and-wpml-performancs-problem#post-99984 Thu, 07 Mar 2013 08:17:35 +0000 xxtita 99984@http://www.kriesi.at/support/ <p>hi kriesi,<br /> it seems that coherence together with <a href="http://inoplugs.com/wpml">WPML</a> 2.7.1 is pretty slow. the backend works really slow, and in the frontend the portfolio <a href="http://montanara-ramsau.at/ferienwohnung/" rel="nofollow">http://montanara-ramsau.at/ferienwohnung/</a> is also not working well. please check <a href="http://www.montanara-ramsau.at" rel="nofollow">http://www.montanara-ramsau.at</a> - thanks </p>